Mass Movement Leadership as Party Planning
It seems that up until now, there have been no leadership organizations within the racist movement. The movement has been broken into two categories, both being rather ineffectual on their own and disdain to cross paths.
The first type I will classify as the literary movement. This movement is largely a stay at home movement. They tend to be a bit older. They like to read interesting journals and perhaps if they work up a ton of motivation, they’ll attend and annual conference, which really amounts to an intelligent form of party.
They seem to have no real tangible objective. They like to read interesting articles. They may not like the direction that society is going, but it hasn’t occurred to them to formulate a plan to change it. As long as they get more self-reinforcing literature to read, they’re happy. The leaders of this movement are actually smart enough to know what’s going on. However, instead of organizing and pooling resources to enact change in the real world, they’ve decided to provide entertainment for their readership. So the leader is an entertainer, who just routinely meets deadlines and comes up with more interesting stories for their audience at whatever regular intervals they can keep up. The big conference, for the really ambitious, is quite a hoot as well. The theory, I guess, is that once everyone on the planet is a subscriber, things will just change without having to take any action. Of course that day will never come.
The second type of movement I’ll call the “action” movement. These folks tend to be young and energetic. The leadership are quite intelligent, although inexperienced and often ill-disciplined. Their followers are just plain lazy and stupid. They, at base, have the exact same function and strategy as the literary movement, it is just more low brow in its approach. Here’s the formula. The leaders throw parties for the lazy and stupid followers. As long as enough lazy and stupid people show up to drink beer, they figure they are successful. Just like with the literary types, it’s all a numbers game. The more idle spectators you can amass, the more successful are your efforts, obviously. Just try to have such meetings with no alcohol at the ready and see how many people show up! They’re constantly trying to increase the idle herd.
So, the entire movement becomes one giant string of publicity stunts. To seem relevant to the idlers, one must have more spectacles. So, they will march in the streets to attract a ton of media attention. Or they periodically waste a bunch of time and money handing out flyers or throwing them on people’s lawns who don’t give a shit about what they’re saying. The entire purpose of all of these practices is to generate media controversy, so they can tell the idlers that their weekly or monthly beer party is where it’s at. Again, no change for the race is actually occurring. These groups just ebb and flow. Leaders burn out, and then new ones come along. It’s all predicated on the fact that once everyone on the planet comes to your party, you can win an easy victory without having to really do anything to change things.
What if people never show up, or the subscribers never come? Then what?
To plan a movement like that is to plan your financial future based on when you win the lotto.
One should have a plan for victory that includes nothing and no one more than we have already at our disposal. We already have hundreds of thousands of activists in the US today. We don’t need to recruit anymore. We simply need to organize them and put them to work, and not many of them either. Most of them won’t ever contribute any work.
Money is power. Leaders need to drop their high profile and their idle followers. They need to network only with leaders of other organizations, for it is that leadership class who is doing all of the work anyway! They need to make money and pool money. Once you have the finances, you can achieve anything. We need to buy land. We need to move White people to that land. We need to drive non-Whites away from that land. It all takes money, and that’s all it really takes. $10 in dues or subscription fees will never get you there.


Good article. As someone with some experience in this, what would you suggest American (and elsewhere) White nationalists reading this blog to tangibly set goals for and try to achieve on an individual basis?
I would like it if racists would read this article and the “Path to Victory” article and internalize the message. I would encourage them to adopt the study habits I have outlined and put themselves into a secure financial position. Without money, one is essentially worthless. It sounds terrible, but it’s true. One needs to make obtaining the necessary financial skill set top priority. He should also choose his friends carefully and discard those who are not on the same path. Only when we are financially sound and networked with others who are financially capable, will we get anything accomplished. We can move mountains without media cameras, counter protesters, or even criticism.
Land ownership, indispensable professional expertise , and marketable goods production is what looks to me like the combo that wins. One thing that we have going for us is that Whites still own most of the private land, by far, and for better or worse the bankrupt govt is going to sell and lease more land to raise capital in the years ahead. Positioning for that is vital, though much of the best stuff already has eyes and even hands on it.
I agree.
Pingback: Linkage is Good for You: Blah Blah Blah Edition
Balltanit,
Leader as employer and landlord is better than leader as entertainer. You are absolutely right.
My vision is a network of businesses and apartment buildings and farms in the area of a county. The tenants/employees work for the businesses/farms and those who work hard can buy out a business become an owner himself, at which time he can opt to leave the network or stick around and work with us. I think they’ll tend to stick around.
A network like this can operate more efficiently than the corporate system and thus accumulate capital/profit by taking advantage of the horrendous inefficiency of the corporate system.
The owners and the tenants/employees are able to accumulate capital by things like:
1. Owning one car per 5 people, or even per 10.
2. Accumulate a diversity of businesses doing things that that we ourselves need, so as much as possible of our expense is recycled back into our own network
3. Own apartment buildings as “co-ops” so when your apartment is paid off, all you do is contribute to a pool for upkeep, utilties and taxes for the building.
In other words, we slow down our money. Money rushes through us in the present world. The gods give it to us just long enough for us to have lodging this month and food for today, and then take it back in a whirl so we cannot accumulate capital or be our own lenders. A local economy can slow down money, and have an alternate banking system.
The goal of the local economy is that every participant be able to accumulate capital and become an owner of an income producing asset, while being part of a community that helps itself live more frugally.
This might help: http://www.amazon.com/Frank-L.-DeSilva/e/B002MG6O0A/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_2?qid=1337791302&sr=8-2
If you are who I think you are, we’d like to thank you for your service to our race.